7
Jun
From thisarticle:
The proposal was designed largely by just four of President Bush’s most trusted senior aides, meeting for 10 days in a bunker-style, secure conference room beneath the White House.
This mythmaking stuff makes me ill. They had the plan for 14-months. They dismissed it out-of-hand back then, and now, when it is politically expedient, they are calling it their own.
I wonder what Gary Hart and Warren Rudman (and even Newt Gingrich for that matter) think of all this posturing?
![[Post to Twitter]](http://getdonkey.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/tweet-this-small.png)
Tweet ThisRelated posts:
- New Yorkers don’t want cuts to schools or healthcare The NY Working Families Party has commissioned a poll that...
- NY-19 — Meet the Candidates Tonight in Peekskill Back in the comments of my previous NY-19 post, there...
- Un-frikkin-real From the Washington Post: French officials were prepared to provide...
- Dick Cheney is a liar I thought the most cringe-worthy moment of the VP debate...
- Letter to the editor and debate reaction Followed through on my commitment to KE04 to write letters...
12:19 pm on June 7th, 2002
And I wonder how long it took the Hart-Rudman team…which was comprised of *14* experts…took to develop their report. Far longer than 10 days I would imagine.
8:27 am on May 2nd, 2003
What does bunker bunkum actually mean?
10:12 pm on May 2nd, 2003
Simon,
It means that last year’s myth about Bush Administration staffers huddling in a bunker to create Bush’s “bold” Homeland Security plan was a load of crap. They pretty much lifted the thing from a report written by Gary Hart and Warren Rudman.
12:08 pm on May 31st, 2003
do you guys know of a film which has the phrase ‘retreat to bunker bunkum”?